Sakitlik.az — Redesign & Technical Rescue
Sakitlik is a leading Azerbaijani company specialising in sound and vibration insulation for homes and commercial spaces.
They had a website. It was the problem.
The problem
This is the most common situation we see, and the least discussed: a site that is not broken enough to force a decision.
It loaded — slowly. It worked — mostly. It had bugs affecting performance and compatibility, the kind that produce a vague sense that something is off rather than an obvious failure. On a phone it was awkward. Nothing was catastrophic, so nothing got fixed, and it quietly cost them visitors for years.
There was also a specific problem for this business in particular. Acoustic insulation is invisible work. You cannot photograph silence. What you can photograph is the installation — the materials, the process, the finished room — and that gallery is the entire proof that the company knows what it is doing. It needed to be central, and it needed to be something they could keep adding to.
What we did
Redesigned the layout and the experience. Not a coat of paint — the structure was reconsidered around what the visitor is actually trying to find out: do these people know how to solve my noise problem.
Fixed the bugs. The performance and compatibility problems that had been silently degrading the site.
Improved load speed. Directly, measurably. Slow pages lose people before they see anything, and this site was losing them.
Rebuilt mobile. Properly, not as a squeeze. Most visitors arrive on a phone; the site now treats that as the primary case.
Integrated a dynamic photo gallery. The proof, given the place it needed, and built so new work goes in without a developer.
Added an admin panel. Content management for the team, so the gallery stays current.
Configured the server and handled deployment. Set up properly, tuned, shipped.
Why this was a redesign, not a rebuild
Worth being specific, because we tell clients this both ways and it is the single most expensive decision in this kind of project.
The foundation here was sound. The problems were real — speed, bugs, mobile, structure — but they were fixable in place, and the underlying site was something a normal developer could work on safely.
Had that not been true, the honest answer would have been to start over, and patching would have been money spent to delay it. The tests that tell you which one you are looking at are worth running before anyone quotes you anything, because a redesign on a broken foundation costs more than a rebuild and works less well.
This one passed. So we fixed it.
Result
A faster site that works properly on the devices people actually use, with the company's work displayed as the evidence it is, and a team who can add to it themselves.
Built by DAKER — redesign, development, admin panel, server configuration, deployment.
